I felt compulsion of writing this
after listening to BBC world radio news about the Boston bombing accused
brothers, wherein the discussion revolved around how the brothers got
radicalized. Newsmen were discussing how Tamerlane had changed radically during
his last visit to his native town in North Caucuses (Russia). During an
interview with his aunt it was asked whether he had started going to mosques.
It appeared from the discussion that the accused used to visit local mosque and
a change was noticed by his father and his aunt on his last visit to North
Caucuses six months ago and it was understood that the guy was actually
radicalized in US itself. It also appeared that the family of the man was not
religious at all and they seldom visit a mosque. Though, it is not difficult to
understand the situation of ethnic Chechans in North Caucuses (Russia), which
is passing through a clash between the separatists and the Russian Federation.
However, what troubled me is that how the West understands the process of
‘radicalization’ of a person. If someone is a practicing his religion, going to
churches or a temple or for that matter a mosque, how can it be understood that
the person is being ‘radicalized’ to become a terrorist? I understand this
could be one of the processes. But when we cast a glance at the cases of
terrorism and their executers, we can easily see a trend that most of them are
those who did not study Islam at their primary level (they did not read Quran and
have no basic knowledge about their religion), which was a mandatory atleast,
in South Asia.
A child
begins his/her education in a traditional Muslim household with bismillah-khwani
(reading of bismillah), which is administered by an elder in the family or
an imam of a nearby mosque who also takes care of basic education in the
maktab attached to the mosque. In my family like others of my village,
every child attended a maktab attached to the local mosque, where we
learnt reading Arabic (basically, Quran), reading and writing Urdu, Persian and
Hindi and did basics of mathematics (jama, ghatao, zarab & taqseem). Interestingly, while
learning Urdu, we were instructed into basics of Islam, which included Islamic history
and a blend of basic dos and don’ts of Islamic way of life. We had a series of
Urdu books called Urdu ki Pehli (First book of Urdu), Urdu ki Doosri (Second
Book of Urdu), Urdu ki Teesri (third book of Urdu), Urdu ki Chauthi (Fourth
book of Urdu) and Urdu ki Panchvi (Fifth Book of Urdu). I remember a
couple of stories from the series through which I think, one can peep into the
content of the syllabus.
The story
begins with a header: ‘One should honor his guest whether he is a Muslim or
not’
Prophet
Mohammad always emphasized on giving respects to the visiting guests. Once a
group of Jews visited the Prophet, since the number of guests was large and he
had limited resources, he asked his sahabi (companions) to distribute
one person each among themselves and honor them in fitting manners. One of them
was known for his mischievous activities, therefore none from among the
companions of the Prophet agreed to host him and he stayed with the Prophet
himself. The Prophet got prepared all kinds of good food for the guest. A
well-known mischief like him ate all the food and did not think of other people
whose guest he was! The prophet did not say him anything and made his bed for
his comfortable stay. After such an
over-eating, he fell ill and he kept running to the toilet whole night. By the
dawn, he even soiled the bed and left home without informing anyone, when the
Prophet came looking for him, he did not find his guest. He enquired about the
guest but no one had any clue about him. The companions of the Prophet could
not bear the insult inflicted on the Prophet of Allah and started fuming at the
Jew, the Prophet of Allah said, ‘do not say anything to the man, he was my
guest and it is my duty to be respectful to him’. The Prophet then started
washing the bed-sheet with his own hand. In the meantime, the Jew came back to
take his jewel studded sword, which he had left in the room and he saw that
Prophet Muhammad is washing his clothes which he had soiled with his feces.
Seeing this he felt ashamed and offered his apologies to the Prophet.
Now the
narrator of the story says, dear children! Be alert! Always take care of your
guest by offering him good food, with your gentle smile and good behavior, it
doesn’t matter if he is a non-Muslim, he is equally honorable and your duties
towards your guests are the same.
The story is from the first book (Urdu
ki Pehli), which means the student has just learned how to read Urdu
therefore, the story is small and uses very simple words which can easily be
read by a beginner. However, the text becomes richer with every step and it can
be found in subsequent books of the series.
I remember one more story which was
perhaps from a higher volume of the series. The story belongs to the Hijra era
of the Prophet, it is like this:
It is said that there was only one well in
Medina, which was the property of a Jew, who used to sell its water. The Prophet considered water among God’s bounties
to His creatures and it should not be bought or sold,
therefore, he asked the Jew to sell his
well, known as Bir Ruma to the Muslims. The Jew demanded a very hefty price, which Muslims were unable to pay. Then
the Prophet asked him to sell half of his possession and the deal got struck at a very inflated
price. Uthman b Affan paid the price and Muslims became owner of half of the
well.
It was agreed that the Muslims and the Jew
shall
draw water every alternate day. On the day
reserved for Muslims, general public, Muslims as well as Jews used to store
water for the next day. Hence, the demand for his (Jew’s) water completely ceased. The Jew, now,
requested the prophet to purchase his share of the well too and the Muslims,
after paying some more money dedicated it for the use of general public,
Muslims as well as Jews. This way the Prophet allowed the creature of
God to enjoy His bounty for free. Dear children, the Prophet not only belong to
the Muslims, he is rahmat ul lil aalamin (grace for the worlds); he
belongs to the entire creature.
This story, in fact,
is taken from Muslim Sharif, the Hadith (Traditions of the Prophet),
which is a source of Islamic history. I found this very recently while writing
a paper on waqf. In the above
stories, the young minds are being taught coexistence not on the basis of
fictional stories rather the compiler of the texts uses history of the Islamic
past, which no one can deny, particularly the so called ‘revivalists’ or the
orthodox, those who are called radicals like salafis or wahabis. The education of maktab can provide a
Muslim child with substantial knowledge of Islamic history giving them a
necessary knowledge-backup to decide what is right for them and what is
politically motivated and they will not become canon-fodder to those who do
their destructive identity politics.
Its a very good and precise write up. Every time Islam and Islamic educational institutes such as Maktab and Madrassa are linked to terrorism. They never look at some democratic elements especially quota system on the basis of caste, creed, religion etc. cultivate the ground for such kind of violent activities. We see that our economic planning in name of socio-economic development have created 2 classes of people in every ethnic group and and every segment of population, 1. an elite group of blood-suckers, 2. the poor group struggling to make a living.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately this blood-suckers group always frame strategy by raising issues to scatter common people in the name of quota. The Bodoland riots was burning example. It was given autonomous status earlier which has authority to have weapons.
Unfortunately we never talk about it, rather blame Muslim for every violent act. (For details one can read "Down the Memory Lane" by Abdul Muhib Mazumdar)
Thanks for finally talking about > %blog_title% < Loved it! outlook 365 login
ReplyDelete